MELANCHOLIA PART TWO

Earl Jackson, Jr

SHOCKS OF RECOGNITION: ROBERT GLÜCK'S SCANDALOUS NARRATIVES
"To merely record what happened requires an imaginative effort similar to falling in love"
Robert Glück, Jack the Modernist

Local Phallic Melancholia

At one point in Samuel R. Delany's "Tale of Plagues and Carnivals," the narrator digresses from the diegesis, speculating that if "mid-twentieth century orthodox Freudian were to present" Nevèr˙on's gay Pheron "with the theory of penis envy and 'sublimation' he would probably have said: 'The only thing is I envy them too. And I've got one. Nor is it small. And heaven knows, I don't sublimate. I go right for it'" (188). Pheron's rejoinder evinces a more unambiguously antiphallic irreverence toward the penis than many of the gay porn films that document the behavior Pheron boasts of. Pheron's apostasy dispels the phallus but inversely revivifies the mystery of desire whose object is now bereft of a master narrative that would warrant such awe or devotion. The secular challenges the meanings of desire and its objects pose are central concerns in the narratives of Robert Glück.
Jack the Modernist is a first-person narrative reconstruction of a relationship between a writer, Bob, and an actor-director, Jack. The lucid paradoxes of Bob's desire often suggest nuanced narrative expositions of some of the implications of Pheron's "penis envy." In the novel Glück localizes gay sexuality in ways that disengage the penis from the socially enforced slippage between the male member and the transcendental signifier, but in his specifications of the narrator's desire, Glück synthesizes the demystification of the penis in gay porn with the melancholia of desiring representation epitomized in Cooper's work.
The demystification of the penis clarifies the object of desire as irreducibly in excess of any real object. Jack the Modernist offers an agnostic meditation on this excess and on the anarchic pull toward the gap left by any of the object's substitutive manifestations, in the passage in which Bob compares his physical desire for Jack's penis to a yearning "to touch it like the neck of the Winged Victory - a shower of blue sparks" (29). The Winged Victory has been headless since its original discovery. In wanting to touch the neck, Bob wants to touch the edge between being and nonbeing, between the tangible and the ineffable, between the manifest and its mystery. The statue itself is an icon from a lost cult, an artifact whose deglossed otherness allows it to signify only its meaningfulness but not its meaning. Having senselessly survived the mythic time of its intelligibility, the statue now inspires awe based on the oblivion of the context that could justify it. Jack's penis evokes a similar mysterium tremendum in Bob, and harks back to an equally fabulous past of the desiring subject's prelapsarian wholeness, a primordial union with the lost object that would reveal the meaning of this surrogate's urgency. The blue sparks Bob imagines his touch will ignite are both real and mystical - delight, color, physical thrill, a warning, a punishment - and certainly the sparks that burned the Wicked Witch of the West when she attempted to take Dorothy's ruby slippers - a specifically gay canonical exemplum of the impossible object of desire.
Although Bob's erotic investment in a real and available penis as tangible object of desire may withdraw psychic participation from the dominant misidentification of penis and phallus, it does not rationalize desire or achieve a consistent control over its operations. "Pleasure is close to awe, I bowed my head. He 'let me' take his cock. . . . (Jack's cock: on which so many emotions hung their hats) . . . "I stopped a moment and looked at it - an elegance completely trustful of itself, erect and shiny. It equaled the intensity I was able to feel. I don't have a language to describe that intensity so I lack the thought. . . . What did I want from this flesh peninsula that made me so urgent? Sucking, stroking-a hopelessly inadequate language . . . The concept of pleasure didn't touch the engagement and physical call" (Jack 28-29). The narrator literalizes the penis, he does not "dephallicize" it. But the "transcendence" of this phallus is rigorously localized. Jack's cock for Bob becomes a concrete absolute; the profundity of the sexual encounter to Bob's sense of his meaning as a subject is condensed in the physical contact with Jack's penis, with "the sheer exhilaration I feel each time of finding and having what pertains to me, what I pertain to" (ibid. 28).
The "exhilaration" Glück's narrator feels regarding the "pertinence" of Jack's penis, should be considered in the light of Pheron's riddle of "having" one and yet "going for one too." The key word here is "having" - particularly within this detailed "overestimation" of Jack's penis, "having" suggests the Lacanian model of heterosexual relations. We recall that in Lacan's schema, the man "has" the phallus and the woman "is" the phallus, but the man "has" the phallus only through the woman's recognition of his penis as the phallus she "lacks." But as a sexually differenced subject, Bob has the phallus while he seeks it. Although the libidinal interchange between Bob and Jack is conditioned by a phallic signifier which begs comparison with Lacan's heterosexual paradigm, in Glück's scenario the fantasies attached to the penis / phallus are contained within the relationship of the two men, and the metaphors remain within this microcosmic circulation - they do not participate in the occultation of this local "phallic signifier" as a socially generalizable transcendental signifier. In fact, it is clearer here that the penis is not the phallus than it is in the heterosexual contract.i By so assiduously re-playing the phallic signifier within a relationship between two partners who both "have" the phallus, Glück in this regard vindicates Lacan (perhaps more than he might have wished to be vindicated), clearly distinguishing the signifier of desire from the male member.
Glück's initial reimagining of the penis as localized phallus within a specifically circumscribed sexual dynamic between two sexually differenced gay male subjects nevertheless situates those subjects within the Lacanian phallically mediated model of sexual relations. This ostensibly imposes on that desiring subject the logic of castration as (phallically defined) sexual difference. Bob thereby occupies the "woman's" position in the Lacanian dynamic, which in turn implies the narrator's acknowledgment of his own castration. I find this model conceptually inadequate for a real critical appreciation of Glück's work, but for the moment I shall keep the question of castration and related metaphors based on sexual morphology in consideration, as I introduce the ways in which Glück rearticulates the relations among lack, desire, and signifying practice, beyond the constraints of our phallocentric epistemological legacy.
One of the principal double articulations of Glück's sexually differenced narrators illuminates another hidden implication of Pharon's confession of "penis envy": "The only thing is I envy them too. And I've got one. . . . And heaven knows, I don't sublimate. I go right for it.'" ("Tale of Plagues" 188). The sexually differenced subject who "has" yet seeks the "phallus" does not act out a castration fantasy, but rather a melancholia. When two sexually differenced subjects have the phallus yet desire as if they lack it, that performative desiring lack structures itself as a melancholic relation between subject and object. Because Bob's possession of his own penis does not obviate a desire for Jack's specific penis as locally transcendent Phallus, the desire is inherently melancholic, even before the end of their relationship. As in my discussion of Dennis Cooper, I base my understanding of melancholia on Freud's "Mourning and Melancholia," adapting it here to include the range of phantasmatic operations the subject engages, in response to a loss of object that the subject did not actually sustain.ii Glück's desiring melancholia paradoxically emerges from the intense introspective observation of the individual's concrete histories of sexual satisfaction. Such melancholia is also characterized by the subject's conscious realization that the loss is a fantasy. This split belief is the reverse of Freudian fetishism. The fetishist unconsciously says, "I know the (woman's) penis is not there, but still . . . " Glück's melancholic narrator consciously says, "I know I have the penis / phallus but still . . . " Such consciousness of the irreality of the loss one seeks to redress distinguishes this local phallic melancholia from the strictly pathological forms. In fact, this melancholia is not necessarily even an "unpleasant" condition, but rather an awareness thematized within the subject's sexuality of the constitutive contradictions of desire and its articulations specific to phallocentric societies.

Narrative Aphanisis

Local phallic melancholia supports a representational interface between the psychosexual constitution and the signifying practices of the deviant subject, in that the negating affirmation of the sexual subject becomes an aphanitic self-exposition of a narrating subject informed throughout with a consciousness of its own fictionality.iii Glück's melancholic narrators accept the experience of lack that motivates sexuality, and the lack-in-being that structures their acts of self-signification. They express this radical acceptance (which is in itself this melancholia) in narrative articulations that transvalue both "lacks." In Jack, Bob's narration acknowledges his desire as a lack-in-being; but in so doing, he posits himself as a lack-in-being, since the narrative that "presents" him realizes him as an effect of the signifying chain. Glück's narrators reflect an idiosyncratically conscious practice of aphanisis. The narrating personae are coextensive with the askesis of writing oneself out (in both senses of the phrase). The subject is realized intradiegetically as a first-person narrator / character constituted by the loss of the real that even lovemaking is based on and reenacts, and metadiegetically through the highly reflective transposition of this subject into language, a system whose signifiers connote the absence of the referents they posit: "Prolonged scrutiny can become an expenditure of self. . . . I've come to experience the unreeling of interiority and sexual disclosure as such a loss, and also part of a historical trajectory. It's a writing activity that privileges the aggression of naming . . . an ongoing colonization of self into one's own language" (Glück, "Fame" 6). The meta- and intradiegetic levels of representation often converge in the "boyfriend orientation" of the work, through which the boyfriend functions as "a disjunction to project into, a longing for unity, and the medium through which form itself is contemplated as a mystery" (Glück, qtd. Jackson, "Robert" 165). In their elegiac moments, Glück's narrators display one of the aspects of Freud's melancholia that is not a significant feature of Cooper's: "an extraordinary diminution of self-regard, an impoverishment of his ego on a grand scale. In mourning it is the world which has become poor and empty; in melancholia it is the ego itself" (Freud, "Mourning" 246). Glück frequently describes the lost object of desire in terms of how its aftermath conditions the narrator's "self," a withdrawal which does not so much deplete that self as expose the lack founding it: "Rejection coincides too well with a tired romantic song of who I really am, some cancelled trip, some mix-up of modes of transportation, stone steps descending into a lake" ("Denny Smith" 505). Glück's stories of past relationships, lost lovers, or broken promises, concatenate the vagaries of the self as a continually renewable sense of abandonment. The intense attention the narrating persona gives the processes of its own figuration circumscribe the narrator's deferral to the desired object as a gravitational center of greater ontological density, as something more real that provides the substantial texture of the narrator's emotive-affective relation to the world. After Jack leaves Bob, the narrator engages in a long inventory of possible ego-imagos of "Bob" gleaned from porn magazines and personal ads. He interrupts this list to address the absent Jack: "Jack, to be frank with you, I find that the more wicked of us is not myself. Nasty hypocrite . . . If I believed in my existence as I believe in yours" (Jack 113).iv Fabulous Objects of Desire Glück retailors narratives from "world literature" into allegories of desire and its impossible object which resonate variously with their textual environment and the given communities of address. In Jack the Modernist, Bob tells his writing workshop the story of Pwyll and the Maiden from the Mabinogion. Every day Pwyll would see a beautiful woman slowly riding by on a white horse. Each day he would send a man after her to find out her name, but no matter how fast they ran or rode, the woman got farther and farther away, although she never increased her speed. Pwyll tried pursuing her himself with no success. Finally, he shouted to her, "'Maiden . . . for his sake whom thou lovest best, stay for me. 'I will, gladly,' said she, 'and it had been better for the horse hadst thou asked me this long since.'" The story entranced everyone, because it "seemed plucked from the center of a dream. . . . All his straining forward does not equal a small gesture of communication, although it gives that gesture a wonderful import. . . . Desire equals meaning in a cruder, simpler way than we might be comfortable believing" (25-27). As his realization of the impending end of his relationship with Jack grows, Bob consoles himself with the Japanese story of "Yuki-onna," the snow woman. A man married a woman named "Yuki," and, after several years of wedded bliss, the man, reminded of something by the way a light shone on his wife's face, told her an incident that had happened to him before he had met her. Caught in a blizzard, he and an older companion sought shelter in an abandoned hut. "A snow spirit named Yuki-onna entered and breathed over the older man. She approached the younger and told him she would spare him if he promised never to mention her visit. The old man was dead in the morning" (Jack 121). Upon hearing the story, the wife became enraged, and transformed herself into Yuki-onna. She tells her husband that she is sparing him only for the sake of the children, and melts into a puddle on the floor. The husband in Glück's version blames himself not so much for a broken covenant with the supernatural, as for an insufficiency in his storytelling technique - not a moral but a stylistic failure : "'Well, I told it badly. . . . I should have made more of the weather the night the old man died, modulated the tempo, added a metaphor or two. . . . And I didn't describe Yuki-onna . . . bringing through the storm the absolute silence of a mirror, the silence of an object standing midair, completely out of context, alienating. I could only describe her figure by the break in space it created" (121). In both stories, the object of desire is wholly Other. In each case its transcendent essence was contained - at least temporarily - by an earthly, intelligible form; at other times both women were characterized as utterly unattainable. The reality of the Yuki-onna exceeded the husband's ability to describe it - it could be connoted only by a lacuna in the discourse, a diffractory representation that merely marked the incommensurability of language to desire, an ecstatic signifying failure. The Yuki-onna story serves as an allegory for desire in general, and in Glück's contexts also as an allegory of the subversive effects of gay male sexuality on the heteropatriarchal fantasy of the transcendence of the phallus. Yuki-onna is the Phallus, the ultimate object of desire and the transcendental signifier in the dominant order. Gay male desire for penises as penises, and their representations of them as penises, is the blasphemy of the husband who tells the truth about the "god," a discursive act "intolerable to this divinity who exists above or below articulation." The divergent effects of the husband's story also support this analogy: "The story partializes her; for him it makes her actual" (121). She vanishes, violated by the shock of recognition of herself in her husband's narrative. The Pwynn fable, on the other hand, deals with the internally distancing structuration of the have-have melancholia of gay male sexuality, conditioning both pornographic representation and intersubjective sexual experiences. For Dennis Cooper, the image of the porn star Jeff Hunter is a hierophany: "It's not Jeff who moves me. . . . He's the part I can relate to. It's as though some concept way over my head has taken human form so we can communicate, like aliens did in B films" ("Square One" 84). Sexual acts also exceed the facticity of pleasurable friction and involuntary muscle spasm: "We fuck intensely in order to assuage a longing for happiness predicated on a beautiful turn of the head, good forearms, nice basket, nice ass, a dark Russian smile, a blond smile, a glower - longing based on distance; distance is compelling and these encounters are the erotics of distance" (Glück, Jack 123). The erotics of distance are embedded in the Pwynn fable, but further extended into pornographic representation, in that the object is both there and not there, a distance as insurmountable as either of the uncanny personifications in Glück's stories. Narrative focuses on the impossibility of attaining the object of desire, the specular deals with its enigmatic possibility. This returns us to the sexual identity politics in the relations established between the specular and narrative modes of representation, which we shall consider here with particular attention to the deviant strategies for narrative articulations of these tensions and narrative interventions therein.


From: Earl Jackson, Jr. "Scandalous Narratives," Chapter Five of Strategies of Deviance (Indianapolis and Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1995) Theories of Representation and Difference. Teresa de Lauretis, General Editor.

Fuente: http://www.anotherscene.com/detective/melan2.htm

Ir al índice de Melancolía y Literatura

Gerardo Herreros http://www.herreros.com.ar